The Initiative for Inclusive Security
A Program of Hunt Alternatives Fund
Log In
  HOME ABOUT US CONTACT US PRESSROOM RESOURCES SEARCH
   


 REGIONS
 Africa
 Americas
 Asia
 Europe
 Middle East

 THEMES
 Conflict Prevention
 Peace Negotiations
 Post-Conflict
     Reconstruction


 OUR WORK
 Building the Network
 Making the Case
 Shaping Public Policy

 PUBLICATIONS

 IN THEIR OWN VOICES
 Kemi Ogunsanya,
    DRC

 Martha Segura
    Colombia

 Mary Okumu
    Sudan

 Nanda Pok
    Cambodia

 Neela Marikkar
    Sri Lanka

 Pumla Gobodo-Madikizela
    South Africa

 Rina Amiri
    Afghanistan

 Rita Manchanda
    India

 Rose Kabuye
    Rwanda

 Sumaya Farhat-Naser
    Palestine

 Terry Greenblatt
    Israel

 Vjosa Dobruna
    Kosovo

Searching for the Right Question:
Spotlight on Terry Greenblatt, Israel

I believe that existing borders are not necessarily an obstacle for women. Led by our feelings and instincts, women will cross them. Nothing will stop us. It is scary to me, that as bad as the current situation is, no one is asking us what we-the women-think or have to offer; no one has yet realized how critical our contribution is to the process. As women we want to be able to look our children in the eyes, without shame, and tell them that injustice was committed in our name, and we did our best to stop it. Even when we are women whose very existence contradicts each other, we will talk-we will not shoot.-Terry Greenblatt

Terry Greenblatt
, Director of Bat Shalom, Israel's National Women's Peace Organization, has been a women's rights and peace activist in Israel for the past 20 years. Committed to both peace and equality, she lobbies for the enforcement of equal rights for all of Israel's citizens-men and women, Jews and Arabs. Terry is an advocate locally and internationally for the Israeli and Palestinian women who remain committed to the vision of a peaceful and just resolution of the conflict. She consults and speaks nationally and internationally on multicultural organizing and politics, and facilitates the development of cross-cultural organizations and coalitions. As a co-founder of Kol Ha-Isha (The Women's Voice) Feminist Center of Jerusalem and Shani, Israeli Women Against the Occupation, and a member of the founder's council of the Community School for Women's Studies and Economic Development, she works to provide women with the support they need to be effective and visible to policymakers, and advocates for social and political change and lasting peace and co-existence.

The following is taken from Terry Greenblatt's July 2001 speech as part of a panel of Israeli Peace Activists at the San Francisco Jewish Film Festival.

I live in Jerusalem, and I have spent much of the past 10 months being scared. In hopes of generating a discussion that might take us beyond attacking and delegitimizing each other�I want to talk about the fear we share these days�and the questions I believe we should consider together.

I am the director of Bat Shalom, the national Israeli women's peace organization and a core member organization of the Women's Coalition for Peace. For the past 10 months, Jewish and Palestinian Israeli women have been relentlessly, creatively, and courageously opposing the escalating violence and human rights violations in our region.

We are scared as we protest in the streets of Tel Aviv and in Palestinian villages under siege. We have stood huddled in small groups of six or seven, as well as with the over 10,000 women and men in 150 cities and towns around the world who stood in solidarity with us this past June 8. [June 8 marks the anniversary of Israel's occupation of the Palestinian Territories. On June 8, 2001, Women In Black held a vigil and march in concert with other organizations around the world, calling for peace.] We are harassed and cursed, harassed and arrested. And again I am scared as we raise our voices for a peace born in justice-the only kind of peace that will ensure long-term security for our two peoples-and scared again as we demand a mutually negotiated agreement that provides each side with the land, historical narrative, resources, and dignity it deserves�

[I am] anxious as I sit across from a Palestinian peace and liberation colleague before an Israeli-Palestinian woman's political dialogue, and she opens with a smile, and then a tear, and looks over and says, "Terry, my soul is overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of death." Frightened again, that I am not large enough to hold her pain, scared that I could potentially drown in her well of desperation.

And on the days that I stand witness as part of the Israeli women's checkpoint watch, monitoring and documenting human rights abuses at Israeli checkpoints around Jerusalem, the three women who are on duty with me tentatively exchange emergency phone numbers with each other in case something should happen while on duty. I find that my stomach only calms down when I have crossed back into West Jerusalem, and all that I am left to deal with is the normal level of anxiety that accompanies us as we make our individual ways home, traveling on the public buses and in taxis that do not always make it to their destinations without blowing up.

But the more profoundly scary situations for me oftentimes have little to do with my own physical safety. In recent months, Israeli, American, and Palestinian participants in the Oslo and Camp David negotiating teams have been publishing opinion papers on the collapse of the peace process. We now have documentation that reveals the original spirit and intention of Oslo-which was based on the understanding that the imbalance of power between the occupier and the occupied, and the negative history between our two peoples- represented almost insurmountable obstacles for conventional-type negotiations.

As Israeli negotiator Dr. Ron Pundak noted, "Our goal was to work towards a conceptual change, which would lead to a dialogue based, as much as possible, on fairness, equality, and common objectives. For many years, our two peoples had tried to attain achievements at the expense of the other side. Every victory won by one side was considered a defeat for the other. In contrast," says Dr. Pundak, "Oslo was, from the start, guided by efforts to abandon this approach and to achieve as many win-win situations as possible..."

The spirit of Oslo was never tested, and therefore it is unacceptable to say that a negotiated settlement is impossible. Oslo didn't fail, we did. I am terrified to know that our leadership was aware of the profound shift in consciousness and public education for peace that were necessary to attempt a negotiated agreement, and was unable to, or chose not to, risk authentically acknowledging the other side as an integral partner for our own success. We never sat down together on the same side of the table and TOGETHER LOOKED at our common and complex joint history, with the commitment and intention of not getting up until-in respect and reciprocity-we could get up together and begin our new history as good neighbors�

People often ask me what I have learned, living and doing peace work with Israeli and Palestinian women living in a conflict zone. "What I can tell you is that women learn from women's lives. Women's characteristic life experience gives them the potential for two things: a very special kind of intelligence, social intelligence, and a very special kind of courage, social courage. The courage to cross the lines drawn between us, which are also the lines drawn inside our heads. And the intelligence to do it safely, without a gun, and to do it productively." [Cynthia Cockburn, 2001, City University, London, England]

I believe that existing borders are not necessarily an obstacle for women. Led by our feelings and instincts, women will cross them. Nothing will stop us. It is scary to me, that as bad as the current situation is, no one is asking us what we-the women-think or have to offer; no one has yet realized how critical our contribution is to the process. As women we want to be able to look our children in the eyes, without shame, and tell them that injustice was committed in our name, and we did our best to stop it. Even when we are women whose very existence contradicts each other, we will talk-we will not shoot.

I am suggesting that it is imperative and constructive for us, all of us, to individually and communally examine our fears. There is much that informs our political positions and passions that has its roots in those fears. In that process of examination lies much of the potential for the genuine unity and identity we might one day be able to reclaim-together. For though we promise and envision according to our hopes, we perform only according to our fears.


read other spotlights

 

return to top